O
Redondo Beach
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Impulse Space variance

Redondo Beach

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (11)

At a glance

Public comments
16
Last 30 days
16

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.

Public comments (16)

OpposedLori ZaremskiOct 6, 2026

Opposed the variance, citing Redondo's history of fighting oversized development and warning that approval sets a precedent for industrializing North Redondo.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 1:48:49 →
SupportiveColton BoyerOct 6, 2026

Supported the appeal, calling the 8-foot difference trivial for an industrial area and saying aerospace growth is the direction Redondo should head.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 1:52:30 →
OpposedJim MuellerOct 6, 2026

Opposed the tanks on the Manhattan Beach Boulevard frontage, contrasting Northrop's landscaping and setbacks, and urged District 5 voters to remember the issue in the March election.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 1:53:25 →
SupportiveLisa BealeyOct 6, 2026

A District 5 resident about 1,300 feet away supported the variance, saying she researched the gases herself, trusts city safety oversight, and values the company's 400+ local jobs and internships.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 1:55:36 →
SupportiveThomas FayOct 6, 2026

Supported the variance, saying cryogenic gases have been used in Redondo for decades and the company's billion-dollar growth should stay in Redondo rather than move to Gardena or Carson.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 1:59:05 →
SupportivePaige McReynoldsOct 6, 2026

Supported the variance as a narrow, practical request for standard equipment, suggesting landscaping as a compromise on aesthetics.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:00:41 →
OpposedMin WenOct 6, 2026

The closest resident homeowner at roughly 200 feet asked the council to uphold the denial, arguing no physical hardship was shown and that Northrop's different zoning isn't a fair comparison.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:01:47 →
OpposedAnne CooperOct 6, 2026

A District 5 resident across the street urged denial, arguing no hardship was proven and that the record lacks independent data on tank alternatives, vibration and verified claims.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:07:58 →
OpposedRoxanne FerrabyOct 6, 2026

A District 5 resident directly across the street said she'll stare at the tanks from her windows forever, criticizing the company's communication and questioning why it leased a parcel too small for its needs.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:07:36 →
OpposedCatherine StrohlineOct 6, 2026

Urged denial, arguing commercial preferences can't legally justify a variance, that alternatives weren't ruled out with engineering data, and that the record lacks independent risk assessment.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:17:29 →
OpposedKateri WoodOct 6, 2026

A 34-year Johnston Avenue resident and third-generation aerospace family member asked the council to uphold the denial, arguing business benefits don't substitute for missing zoning findings.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:20:45 →
OpposedMarianne ParsonsOct 6, 2026

A 46-year Seabold resident living across the street asked the council to oppose the variance, citing nighttime noise, jackhammering at 2 a.m., and saying 'we are not Chevron or El Segundo.'

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:23:59 →
MixedFrank LaceyOct 6, 2026

A 25-year Dow Triangle resident supported Impulse but asked the council to make it work with the community — trees, artwork, whatever it takes to screen the tanks.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:25:59 →
OpposedUnidentified Resident (Jeep Shadith per pronunciation)Oct 6, 2026

Urged the council not to override the Planning Commission on trust alone and to give the variance request further study rather than approve it that night.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:29:05 →
OpposedJess MoneyOct 6, 2026

Called arguments about jobs 'fatuous,' described cryogenic tank explosion videos and asphyxiation hazards, and urged denial plus a revisit of safety codes.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:28:39 →
OpposedLaura McMorrinOct 6, 2026

Urged the application be sent back as incomplete — no scaled site plan or elevation — and suggested conditioning approval on landscaping to screen the tanks like the code requires for other tanks.

City Council — October 6, 2026 · 2:35:27 →